Srikkanth Questions SRH's Re-signing of Pacer Natarajan

Published by

CFLL Staff

Published on

20 Oct 2026 | 02:30 PM
Share
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Whatsapp
LinkCopy
newsimage
Picture Credit: BCCI

Former Indian cricketer Kris Srikkanth has launched a scathing attack on Sunrisers Hyderabad (SRH) concerning their decision to re-sign T Natarajan. While Srikkanth believes Natarajan's return to the franchise is a good move for the pacer personally, he has openly questioned the team's rationale.

 

Srikkanth's primary concern revolves around Natarajan's recent decline in both form and fitness, which he believes makes the re-signing a questionable choice for SRH. His criticism implies a significant gap between the pacer's current state and the performance levels expected at the professional tier.

 

Srikkanth Highlights Pacer's Availability

 

The ex-cricketer did not mince words when addressing the left-arm pacer's on-field presence. Srikkanth explicitly stated, and was quoted, saying that T Natarajan "'Plays Just 40 Days A Year'," highlighting a perceived lack of consistent availability or readiness.

 

This particular observation by Kris Srikkanth underscores his reservations about the pacer's ability to consistently contribute to the team's efforts throughout a demanding season. His remarks suggest a concern over long-term player reliability and fitness management issues.

 

Questioning Franchise Strategy

 

The veteran’s comments directly challenge the strategic decision-making process of Sunrisers Hyderabad. Srikkanth's viewpoint suggests that franchises must prioritize a player's current physical condition and consistent performance over other factors when making recruitment choices.

 

He questioned why SRH would commit to re-signing a player given these publicly known struggles with both form and fitness. Srikkanth's critique adds a strong voice to the ongoing discussions about team composition and player evaluations in professional cricket.

 

Implications for Natarajan

 

While Srikkanth acknowledged the personal benefit for Natarajan returning to SRH, his broader criticism focuses on the team's perceived oversight. This situation highlights the fine balance between supporting a player's recovery and ensuring team competitiveness with available talent.